10
524
・at the Inquiry'
On
Comparing
letters
of Prokeat with a private note
from the
Chairman
of
the 14th ultimo, inviting my presence,
the above mentiones two
Note from the
Chairman of t Caldwell. Come me of the 17 June
to in his statements.
If this Excellency is eatiefics, from the
foregoing observations, of the unfair news of calling.
akon
me, until all the evidence is
I am enabled to state
interval and a
positively very important
that
during the entere
before and, for or
One
I did not once
attend the settings of
Letter of Prote of the 14: Sun
written statement in Explanation my
feller te. (No 433)
or
the Commissim, "not even
1858.
I
the 25.? July 1858
respect
to the charges
as a
spectator, for except
as a muo
spectator
or a
witness I never attended at all, and that I attended
zvedence in
an
the 17th ultimo merely to give my
Jemsuanced of Rack invitation
I specify this instance in proof. But it
was neither the
from
the
in
first nor the last
the last of my absences present on
the Commission. I was not even
days
person,
when Me baldwell made his several defences
and
handed in the documents re
refered to
important a stipp as my
defence of my conduct' with
sergea
by you official of the 2000 instant, I hope to hear further from your departiment before I takie st
If not, this is
my
Statement.
I entreat for it a calm and
Not
Community.
for my
anw
own
sake, but
above all
it
impartial hearing
for that of the
for the charactin
ryos of the Chinese,
of our Government in the I beseech Heis Excellency not to be anxions,
over much, to visit with pains
pains and pesa.
lties an
office of the Queen, merely because he have been
Els
resentiful
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.